The Well-Tempered Ear

Classical music: Can breast cancer and opera mix? | June 17, 2011

By Jacob Stockinger

Breast cancer has touched my family and friends again, so it has been much on my mind and in my thoughts.

Recently, I saw the Madison Opera’s fine staging of Verdi’s “La Traviata,” one of the most popular of all operas, and probably the most popular opera Verdi composed.

The libretto, adapted from a play by Alexander Dumas, focuses on a fiercely independent woman, a heroine and courtesan, Violetta, who is dying of consumption (below, with her lover Alfredo in a photo by James Gill for the Madison Opera).

Back in the 19th and early 20th centuries, that infectious lung disease must have rung very true and been rich with personal meaning. It was prevalent – Chopin suffered from it most of his short life — and it was used in all kinds of art, including the German Nobel Prize-wining novelist Thomas Mann’s “The Magic Mountain.” Puccini also used in it his opera, “La Boheme.”

Consumption – or tuberculosis, as we know it today – became a metaphor for all kinds of disorders and diseases, individual and social. That was discussed by the famed American critic Susan Sontag (below), who herself died of breast cancer.

For more about the role of TB in art and popular culture, visit:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuberculosis_in_popular_culture

So I found myself thinking: If you were to update the opera — as many stage directors do – would substituting breast cancer for TB work. Certainly, breast cancer is a scourge of women today with unexplained rises in incidence. It sure seems more present and threatening than consumption.

Sometimes modern updating seems gratuitous or provocative or just plain playful. The iconoclastic and highly creative and deeply original director Peter Sellars (below) is course prone to those. But he also does profound updating and revisions. I suspect he would not disagree with my idea about Verdi’s “La Traviata” and Puccini’s “La Boheme.” Indeed, perhaps he or someone else has already thought about it or done it.

After all, when the wonderful American mezzo-soprano Lorraine Hunt Lieberson (below) was dying of breast cancer, Sellars cast her in Johann Sebastian Bach’s famous cantatas “My Heart Swims in Blood” and “I Have Enough” and had her sing in a hospital room, next to a hospital bed and dressed in a hospital gown complete with an IV drip and IV stand attached. By all accounts, it was a riveting performance that added new life and updated meaning to the old text and old but eternally haunting and beautiful music.

Here are some reviews of that 2001 performance:

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/02/arts/recordings-staged-bach-without-the-staging.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/03/04/arts/music-staging-unstageable-bach-again.html?src=pm

Sadly, the modern updated staging proved prophetic. Several years later, Hunt Lieberson died of breast cancer.

Other famous women musicians, including soprano Dawn Upshaw – who says she listened to Hunt Lieberson’s recording of those Bach cantatas (below) for inspiration — have fought the same disease. And we all know the sad story of Elizabeth Edwards.

I wonder what they and others would say to the idea of Violetta in “La Traviata” and Mimi in “La Boheme” fighting breast cancer instead of consumption – and after all isn’t metastaic breast cancer just another form of  “consumption,” of a disease that literally consumes the mind and the body?

I suppose you could also use AIDS, or maybe some other more “modern” disease. But breast cancer strikes me as particularly fitting.

What would you say to the idea?

Could breast cancer be substituted for consumption or TB in opera and other works of art?

The Ear wants to hear.


Posted in Classical music

8 Comments »

  1. Interesting idea. I guess I’m surprised that none of the inventive directors haven’t done this sooner. But … how about the coughing episodes?

    Comment by eva wright — June 20, 2011 @ 8:59 am

    • Hi Eva,
      I too am surprised it hasn’t been done — of it hasn’t.
      The coughing episodes could be worked around, I suspect, although coughing and respiratory problems (the pulmonary or lung fiibrosis like Ellsworth Snyder suffered from) can result from chemo and end-stage metastasized tumors to the lungs.
      Thanks for reading and replying thoughtfully.
      Jake

      Comment by welltemperedear — June 20, 2011 @ 9:50 am

  2. Thanks for this poignant reminder that music is about so much more than entertainment. Updating might reawaken some viewers to a dimension of the opera too easily overlooked when it is enjoyed from the comfortable vantage of a world where “consumption” is no longer a frightening, personal possibility. Ed Haertel, Palo Alto, California

    Comment by Ed Haertel — June 17, 2011 @ 9:18 am

    • Hi Ed,
      Thanks for your kind and thoughtful words.
      I think art should often be about comfort AND discomfort. It should challenge us on both fronts.
      It can also be relevant from the past and relevant to the past.
      But it can also be relevant to and from the present or future.
      Best,
      Jake

      Comment by welltemperedear — June 17, 2011 @ 2:26 pm

  3. Conservatively, one could look at an opera as a historical snapshot, a time period which a composer set their work, either in their present day or another time in the past or future from their persepectives. In the cast of “La Boheme,” TB is more realistic in a historical setting than substituting a modern disease, although one could argue that’s been done…

    Now, that leads to another conversation about changing the setting of an opera from one set in the 18th century to an apoctalyptic 24th century (extreme example). What is appropriate to be changed when a director is staging an opera, and what should be considered sacred to the composer’s intent versus a director’s vision?

    Comment by Kenneth Kusiak — June 17, 2011 @ 8:22 am

    • Hi Kenneth,
      That indeed is the dilemma.
      Personally, I think there is room for both — original settings and updated setting, even futuristic ones.
      I feel the same way about original period instruments and playing practices for early music, versus the use of modern instruments, which sometimes have better or least different sonics, longer phrase lines and richer tone.
      There is room for both. depending on what you want to hear or bring out in the music.
      Thanks for reading and replying.
      I’d like to hear more about where you come down on the question.
      Best,
      Jake

      Comment by welltemperedear — June 17, 2011 @ 2:23 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,190 other followers

    Blog Stats

    • 2,047,385 hits
%d bloggers like this: