The Well-Tempered Ear

Classical music review: Violinist Augustin Hadelich and the Madison Symphony Orchestra triumph in an unforgettable and moving performance of Prokofiev’s Second Concerto. | January 24, 2012

By Jacob Stockinger

I doubt I will hear a better performance of any concerto in this season,or many others, than I heard at the Sunday afternoon concert by the Madison Symphony Orchestra.

Several reasons account for that.

One reason is that the concerto was the Violin Concerto No. 2 in G minor, Op. 63, composed in 1935 by Sergei Prokofiev (below), which – hard to believe but true – has never been performed before by the Madison Symphony Orchestra.

It is one of the great concertos, the masterpiece concertos, of the 20th century. It is simply a terrific work that especially in the slow second movement, which opens with a solo aria underpinned by pizzicato plucking, becomes a sublime work, one that brought The Ear to tears with its poignant and breath-taking beauty. (Listen to it at the bottom.)

A second reason is that the young violinist Augustin Hadelich (below), who last played the popular Mendelssohn Violin Concerto with the Wisconsin Chamber orchestra two years ago, was the soloist. At 28, he is not only a complete violin virtuoso, but also a deep musician who puts the music first, never himself or the violin. He has a great future facing him, and we can hope it is a very long one.

The third reason was that the conductor, MSO music director John DeMain (below) was on exactly the same wavelength as Hadelich and offered him an accompaniment that was precise and soulful at the same time.

Listening to Hadelich is to hear the emergence of a great talent. So I add Hadelich to the short list of great young violin talents the MSO has been booking. Hadelich is right at the top of the list, along with the Norwegian violinist Henning Kraggerud (below) who has turned in astonishingly musical versions of such warhorses as the Sibelius and Tchaikovsky concertos.

I have long argued that Prokofiev was the Mozart of the Soviet Union while Shostakovich was its Beethoven. I could develop that argument at length. But on Sunday the music made the argument for me.

Prokofiev can be percussive, but more often he has a transparency, an elegant simplicity and a gift for melody that reminds one of Mozart.

As one veteran listener remarked to me, “I’m not familiar with the concerto, but I found I could really understand it and make sense of it on the first hearing.” Is there a better definition of classicism? Unfortunately, there is a lot of modern and contemporary classical music you cannot say that about.

Both DeMain and Hadelich played with such conviction and dedication that they took you inside the piece. From the opening strain of the solo violin to the closing measure of the energetic and march-like perpetual motion, toccata-like rondo that brought a standing ovation, the Prokofiev concerto enthralled the audience.

I am betting it will not be another 80 years or so before we get to hear this work again at an MSO concert. At least I certainly hope not. What Prokofiev’s Third Concerto is to the piano, his Second Concerto is to the violin – a glorious masterpiece of the modern repertoire that is also a sure-fire hit with audiences.

As for Hadelich, he is the real deal – an heir to such violin virtuosos as Jascha HeifetzDavid Oistrakh and Itzhak Perlman. He has tone and power, lyricism and virtuosity. Even the encore he played, the famous Caprice no. 24 by Paganini (below is the opening of the score) with the familiar theme that Liszt, Brahms, Rachmaninoff and Lutoslawki among others used for variations, sounded more musical than I have ever heard it in live or recorded performances.

In short, Hadelich goes for the music, never the glitz or schmaltz. It is true in his live performances and it is also true of the recordings I have heard. It makes you wonder if the severe burns he suffered in an accident at 15 and took two years to recover from didn’t deepen his maturity and his underlying appreciation of music. But, then again, maybe that is too easy an explanation for his superlative talent.

The other works on the program were extremely well performed, but nonetheless seemed to pale just a little bit in comparison to the superlative and stirring Prokofiev.

Debussy’s “Iberia” was a fine curtain-raiser, especially on an afternoon when we needed a bit of warm and sunny Spain to melt the freezing rain that had begun to fall with its color and rhythms. I often think DeMain is more at home in Ravel, who had a better sense of structure. But he did justice to modernist Debussy in this reading.

The last half of the concert consisted of Tchaikovsky’s early Symphony No. 2 “Little Russian” (or the “Ukrainian,” as Big Russians liked to pejoratively call it) was given a sparking reading by the MSO. That the score is often repetitive to a fault is only to criticize Tchaikovsky’s usual method and to remark that for most listeners, his first three symphonies can’t really compete with the maturity of his last three. Most listeners prefer the Fifth or Sixth (the famous “Pathetique”), while my vote goes for the Fourth.

Still, from the very beginning of his career Tchaikovsky (below) demonstrated a great facility for memorable melodies and appealing, accessible orchestration. (Am I the only  person who thought of Mussorgsky’s popular and dramatic “Great Gate at Kiev” from his “Pictures at an Exhibition” during the opening measures of the last movement of the Tchaikovsky?) Those aspects, present even in this early symphony, made for a solid and stirring performance that wrapped up an outstanding program that will, for me, remain one of the peaks of the current MSO season.

Of course, other critics had other things to say, and it can be fun and illuminating to compare us.

So here are some links to other reviews:

Here is John W. Barker’s review for Isthmus:

http://www.thedailypage.com/daily/article.php?article=35764

And here is Lindsay Christians’ review for The Capital Times and 77 Square:

http://host.madison.com/entertainment/arts_and_theatre/reviews/symphony-explores-with-international-program/article_0981d1e2-443f-11e1-8edb-001871e3ce6c.html

Here is Greg Hettmansberger’s review for Madison Magazine’s “Classically Speaking” blog:

http://www.madisonmagazine.com/Blogs/Classically-Speaking/January-2012/Madison-Symphony-Developing-a-Surprising-Tradition/

And here is Bill Wineke’s for WISC-TV’s Channel 3000:

http://www.channel3000.com/news/30268301/detail.html

Play critic yourself.

What did you think of the MSO concert?

Of the Prokofiev Violin Concerto No. 2?

Of violinist Augustin Hadelich?

The Ear wants to hear.


16 Comments »

  1. Augustin Hadelich is my favorite violinist. I often visit to his site @ http://augustin-hadelich.com/. Very talented violin player

    Comment by Cecilio — April 27, 2012 @ 6:53 am

    • Hi Cecilio,
      Thank you for reading and replying.
      You have excellent taste and judgment.
      Violinist Augustin Hadelich is an astounding talent who has both virtuosity and depth.
      His performance of Prokofiev’s Second Concerto here was magnificent.
      And his new CD of Debussy, Ravel, Prokofiev and Stravinsky (the last two lived in Paris in exile) is a must-have, must-hear recording.
      He deserves to ve very big star.
      I have also met him, and he is a very cordial an friendly man who seems to have no pretense about him.
      All the more reason to like him, I say.
      Happy listening and thank you for the link.
      I will follow his career along with you.
      Best,
      Jake

      Comment by welltemperedear — April 27, 2012 @ 9:20 am

  2. Who is your favorite violist? 😀

    Comment by Mendini — February 6, 2012 @ 3:05 am

    • HI,
      I think you mean violinist, no? That’s what Augustin Hadelich is.
      And there are so many good ones, I would be hard-pressed to name just one. But so far, among younger ones I would list two men (Augustin Hadelich and Henning Kraggerud) and two women (Hilary Hahn and Victoria Mullova).
      But there are many, many more deserving ones.
      If you do indeed mean violists, well that is a more restricted category I don’t know as well. Vladimir Spivakov comes to mind, but then many great violists are also greta violinists. (Pinchas Zukerman comes to mind.)
      More to the point, do YOU have some favorite violinists and violists? It is your business, after all, no?
      Why don’t you share their names and their best recordings with other readers and with me?
      Best,
      Jake

      Comment by welltemperedear — February 6, 2012 @ 9:25 am

      • Favorite Violist: for chops, gorgeous tone and and riveting musicality, I nominate my former teacher, Kim Kashkashian.

        Comment by Marika Fischer Hoyt — February 6, 2012 @ 9:31 am

      • Hi Marika,
        You are absolutely right.
        I love her work, hut especially her ECM recording, with Robert Levin I think, of the last two Brahms sonatas for clarinet or viola — and I prefer her viola version.
        Brahms, for me, has an inherent stringiness, even in his piano writing.
        But Kim Kashkashian has great tone and wonderful interpretive abilities.
        How lucky you were to have studied with her!
        Thanks, as always, for reading and replying.
        Best,
        Jake

        Comment by welltemperedear — February 6, 2012 @ 10:03 am

  3. Thanks for the great review, which mirrored my impressions. No, you were not the only one to think of Mussorgsky’s “Great Gate of Kiev” in the Tchaikovsky. I leaned over to my partner and whispered this (I know, I shouldn’t have), and got a blank look. So thanks for confirming what I heard!

    Comment by Margaret Irwin — January 29, 2012 @ 5:51 pm

    • Hi Margaret,
      Thanks for reading and replying.
      And thank you for confirming my impression, just as you thank me for confirming yours.
      I’ll bet we were;t the only ones who heard that famous theme in this relatively unknown symphony.
      Best,
      Jake

      Comment by welltemperedear — January 29, 2012 @ 9:23 pm

  4. Thank you for putting into words what I felt at working with this artist. We were in the presence of greatness. It was simultaneously humbling and inspiring.

    Comment by Marika Fischer Hoyt — January 24, 2012 @ 11:48 am

    • Hi Marika,
      Thank you;
      That is high praise indeed, coming from another string player and a member of the orchestra and the Ancora String Quartet.
      I trust your ear and am glad my perception agrees with yours.
      Be well.
      Jake

      Comment by welltemperedear — January 24, 2012 @ 12:51 pm

  5. Dr. Jake,
    I am still humbled by last weekend’s concerts.
    Loved it.
    Still amazed how the orchestra continues to reach new heights.
    Regarding your comment about “Ravel,” I think you are right.

    Comment by Barbara DeMain — January 24, 2012 @ 11:32 am

    • Hi Barbara,
      You are 1,000 percent right.
      We are lucky to have such fine music-making right here in our hometown.
      Best to you, Jennifer and John.
      Jake

      Comment by welltemperedear — January 24, 2012 @ 12:52 pm

  6. At the end of the Concerto, I spontaneously blurted out “WOW!” I thought everything was magnificent, from selection, to soloist, to orchestra, to conductor. One of the best presentations of the year so far. Superb!

    Comment by Nina Sparks — January 24, 2012 @ 8:59 am

    • Hi Nina,
      Thanks for reading and replying.
      I agree with your whole-heartedly.
      Not just the best of the season to one of the best of John DeMain’s 18 years with the MSO!
      Cheers to another and best to you.
      Jake

      Comment by welltemperedear — January 24, 2012 @ 9:27 am

  7. I agree wholeheartedly with you about last Sunday’s concert. The concerto is one I’ve loved since studying it in 20th Century music back in my college days. The violinist is really astonishing with his command of the instrument and his musicality.
    The concert was a treat altogether!

    Comment by Eva Wright — January 24, 2012 @ 6:12 am

    • Hi Eva,
      And I agree wholeheartedly with you.
      Thanks for reading and replying.
      Jake

      Comment by welltemperedear — January 24, 2012 @ 10:15 am


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,202 other followers

    Blog Stats

    • 2,080,032 hits
%d bloggers like this: