The Well-Tempered Ear

Classical music: The Metropolitan Opera’s hugely successful “Live in HD” satellite broadcasts are changing the opera world across the U.S. and the globe, according to the New York Times. Next season, the series will expand.

May 5, 2012
2 Comments

By Jacob Stockinger

What kind of impact are the hugely successful “MET Live in HD” satellite broadcasts by the Metropolitan Opera having on the opera world? (In Madison, they are offered at two cinemas: Eastgate and Point, below.)


That is an excellent and, until, now, unanswered question. It is a question that New York Times critic Zachary Woolfe (below) set out to answer this past season – with comparative statistics as well as first-hand observations.

So this past season, which featured 11 different operas, Woolfe (below) traveled to 11 different cities across the U.S to see how they were faring.

The national report or survey is a brilliant idea, and one that explains why The New York Times largely continues to set the agenda for news reporting  be it politics or arts, in the U.S.

Woolfe related what he found in an outstanding front-page Arts Section story last Sunday. It features outstanding research as well as lots of national and international statistics and background or context.

Here is a link:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/arts/music/the-mets-hd-broadcasts-are-changing-opera.html?pagewanted=all

The next logical question, of course, is: How exactly is the same “Met Live in HD” changing the face of opera around the world? I am sure attendance and programming are involved.

As I recall, one music critic, Woolfe’s colleague at the Times senior critic Anthony Tommasini, recently told an audience in Madison how on one night in Vienna, more people were at a “Live in HD” broadcast at the movie theaters than were at a live opera perform at the Vienna State Opera.

And here is a link to the schedule of The Met LIVE in HD broadcast for next season, when it increases from 11 to 12 productions:

http://www.metoperafamily.org/metopera/liveinhd/liveinhd1213.aspx

And here is a link to a follow-up story Woolfe did yesterday about the controversial new production of Wagner’s “Ring” cycle by the Met and how it fared better in HD than live (the story is second on the list):

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/04/06/arts/music/the-ring-cycle-interactive.html

What do you think of the Met’s Live in HD series?

Do you go? Regularly or sporadically?

What do you like or dislike most about them? The ticket price? The quality of the production? The behind-the-scenes looks and interviews with performers?

How do you think it affects attendance, including your own, at live local performances of opera?


    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,238 other followers

    Blog Stats

    • 2,163,857 hits
%d bloggers like this: