By Jacob Stockinger
The Ear got a message from an old friend who gave him a link to a story about the decline of arts criticism in the mainstream media.
“This is not big news to you, but an interesting update that puts the value of your blog in context,” the friend said.
The Ear thinks that the cutback in arts critics hurts local performing artists and also hurts readers who consume the arts as audiences. That is especially important in a city as rich in the arts for its size as Madison. (Below is the Madison Symphony Orchestra playing for a full house.)
Here is a link to the article from the Columbia Journalism Review:
The story earned an interesting response, sort of a constructive dissent from most judgments, from Anne Midgette (below), an arts writer and arts critic who used to work for The New York Times and now works for The Washington Post. Here is a response she posted on Facebook:
“There’s one thing missing from this thoughtful valedictory on newspaper arts writing – the outrage about cutting critics is all very well, but one reason they get cut is that they don’t always have the readership papers want/need (which can be quantified now better than it used to be).
“I think newspapers could help remedy that by putting in more resources and figuring out a strategy for raising the profile of arts writing (and I think arts writers need to focus on thinking about fresh innovative ways to write about their fields, but that’s another story).
“In any case, I think those of us who love the arts need to recognize this as a big factor in the cuts, rather than simply wringing our hands about living in a world of Philistine editors.”
What do you think of Anne Midgette’s response? How would you like arts coverage changed and improved?
How good a job do you think the local media do in covering the arts?
What do you think about the overall reduction in arts coverage?
Have you found alternative sources for news and for information, and what are they?
The Ear wants to hear.