The Well-Tempered Ear

What do you think of the ‘new’ Wisconsin Public Radio? | May 18, 2024

PLEASE HELP THE EAR. IF YOU LIKE A CERTAIN BLOG POST, SPREAD THE WORD. FORWARD A LINK TO IT OR, SHARE IT or TAG IT (not just “Like” it) ON FACEBOOK. Performers can use the extra exposure to draw potential audience members to an event. And you might even attract new readers and subscribers to the blog.

By Jacob Stockinger

Is The Ear alone — the only listener who is apprehensive and even disapproving about the major changes coming to the “new” Wisconsin Public Radio?

Starting this coming Monday, May 20, WPR is about to be severely reinvented.

That is when there will really be two WPRs — an all-music channel and a separate all-news channel — and when schedules for programs and hosts will change drastically.

And, just as importantly, so will the locations the two new stations on the dial.

For more details about the new station maps and numbers as well as background to the Big Makeover, go to the newly redesigned and improved website and especially this page:

Switching stations several times each day to catch the programs that you like should be about as much fun as resetting your clocks and digital timers for going on and off Daylight Saving and after a power outage.

Only you will be doing it non-stop.

No more one-stop shopping from morning to night.

Might just be enough to make some people tune out. 

Or maybe withhold donations, even with what seems an increasing reliance on matching gifts by “generous friends” of WPR.

Of course the promotions and YouTube video from WPR’s recently hired director Sarah Ashworth (below) say the changes will be “exciting” and come after two years of research and analysis. She says the changes will make it easier for listeners around the state to listen to WPR, but they sure sound inconvenient more than user-friendly.

Excuse my doubt.

I like the mix of news and classical music. Always have, alway will.

I like waking up to NPR’s “Morning Edition,” which is my comprehensive morning news briefing. It’s great to listen to while driving to work or resting in bed.

I love the transition to classical music at 9, when I need beauty and am ready to listen to some music. (Below is Stephanie Elkins in the studio where she masterfully hosted the now-defunct “Morning Classics.”)

And after six hours of music, I love hearing “All Things Considered,” one of the few broadcast news programs that take culture seriously in addition to politics, finance and world events. I also love catching Terry Gross’ interviews on “Fresh Air” and financial updates from “Marketplace.” 

I have loved the news-music contrast and combination ever since I came to graduate school in Madison and first tuned in to WPR.

The station has always reinforced the astute observations made by the great American poet William Carlos Williams who said: ‘“Beauty” is related not to “loveliness” but to a state in which reality plays a part”’ and  “It is difficult/to get the news from poems/though men die miserably every day/for lack/of what is found there.”

Beauty and news belong together — integrated, not segregated. (The all-music channel will still have hourly headlines.)

Hard to tell if the changes will take WPR, now over a century old, to greater success or put it on the path to slow suicide.

Other things might have helped increase listenership .

One that comes to mind is playing less second- and third-rate music that is thoroughly boring and forgettable, and then trying to pass it off as important. More of an emphasis on great music — you know, the kind that first made us all fall in love with classical music — and less of an emphasis on obscure musicology and identity programming might have helped.

Another is implementing faster solutions to mechanical problems — including missing online listings, frequent instances of dead air, and chopping off parts of news and music programs.

Anyway, we need to give the new changes a chance. So Monday I will tune in and see how it goes and hope for the best before passing final judgment. But I am not optimistic.

What do you think of the changes?

What would you like to see WPR do more of or less of?

Please leave a comment, however brief.

The Ear and surely the entire staff at WPR want to hear.


Posted in Classical music
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

16 Comments »

  1. I lost wpr with your changes. 88’7 now news is full of static or non existent in Spring Green and Dodgeville. I feel lost and angry without it. My friend in Dodgeville lost hers too. I counted on work. It is gone.

    Like

    Comment by Mary Friedel-Hunt — June 9, 2024 @ 5:56 am

  2. I began listening to WPR fall of 1980. Since then the music has been slowly whittled down. No more Bach to wake up to, no more afternoon jazz, no music at all from 3:00 pm to 8:00 pm, plus constant hourly interruptions. Music is a drug I can handle most of the time, news must be in measured doses or I go crazy. So I’m optimistic about the change, it will be restoring the difference between the two channels. I am a retired biologist and musician. There is rarely good news from a conservation perspective so the music is very important to my mental health.

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by Scott — May 20, 2024 @ 12:50 pm

    • Thank you Scott for your reply. I agree about the balance and how music has been whittled down, even though I was a former journalist. I have other complaints about the rescheduling of Fresh Air and the BBC World Newshour, which is frequently repetitive of All Things Considered. Nonetheless, I still found the combination of extended news and extended music much preferable to what other radio stations and networks were offering and still do. I wish you well in your optimism about the changes. Best wishes, The Ear

      Like

      Comment by welltemperedear — May 20, 2024 @ 1:15 pm

  3. Dear Jacob,

    You expressed my concerns very well. I agree with you.

    Karen Pridham

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by Karen Pridham — May 19, 2024 @ 2:20 pm

    • Thank you Karen for your reply and agreement. I guess we just have to wait and see how the new WPR works. Best wishes, Jake

      Like

      Comment by welltemperedear — May 19, 2024 @ 2:23 pm

  4. Where there’s a will there’s a way? Thinking back to my boyhood 65 years ago in small-town South Dakota trying to find AM broadcasts of my beloved Milwaukee Braves on my transistor radio, smaller than today’s mobile phones.

    Sometimes I could, on stations as far away as Pittsburgh and St. Louis and even, on occasion, Los Angeles.

    No pushbuttons, just turning the little dial back and forth, hoping the game wouldn’t fade away though sometimes it would.

    Ah, First World problems. Lord, give me patience, and give it to me now!

    Thanks for the discussion, Jake.
    — Mr. Bill

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by bdunn9997bc8734 — May 19, 2024 @ 7:52 am

    • Hi Mr. Bill. Thank you for your reply. It might work just as you say. Or one could turn to another famous classical music radio station like WQXR in New York City of WMFT in Chicago. We will just have to see. And yes, it may be a first-world problem, but then I am living and listening in the first world. Best, Jake

      Like

      Comment by welltemperedear — May 19, 2024 @ 2:27 pm

  5. Thank god I’m not the only one who is extremely unhappy with the upcoming changes. Like you, I really appreciate the daily mix of music and news, because, again like you, that’s where I get almost all of my US/world news. (I do watch a local TV channel for Madison/Wisconsin news, but they are not ready for prime time, so to speak.)

    I have been seriously considering pulling the plug on my (admittedly miniscule) donation because of this change. We’re told that there were two years of talking to listeners, focus groups, etc., but I NEVER heard anything about it until it was announced as a done deal, and I have listened to WERN for decades, and know some of the announcers well, having overlapped with one of them in high school (I won’t embarrass either of us in saying how long ago that was!)

    Assuming I continue listening to WPR (which given that there really is no other outlet for classical music in the amount I need here in Madison, seems likely), this changeover will force me to go out and buy a new radio for my bedside table that I can program to bounce back and forth between the 2 channels, so that I get my NPR fix at the times I need it, and my music fix at times I need it.

    It was bad enough when they “updated” the website to make it supposed more “user friendly and navigable”. They screwed that up royally. I find it much more difficult to find the things I’m looking for on it, and what I can find usually has much less information about what I was looking for in the first place. I replied to an e-mail from Sarah Ashworth stating my unhappiness with the website redesign, telling her exactly why I didn’t like it, and got back basically a form letter saying: “What don’t you like, and how can we help you change your mind?” My reaction to that was “You obviously didn’t read my e-mail, so why the hell should I continue trying to get you to see a differing point of view you don’t want to see?”

    One thing I think they really didn’t bother to take into consideration when deciding to make this change was that getting rid of the repeated hours of Morning Edition ( 7.00 – 9.00 am, M – F), and the repeated half hour of ATC (6.00 – 6.30, M – F) would have given them twelve and a half more hours they could have expanded music into. From what I have heard from friends who also have been dedicated listeners of WERN for decades, that would have been enough to keep almost all of them happy.

    My apologies for the length of my reply, but having a friendly Ear listening to what we all have to say about this gigantic bollocks-up is heart-warming, to say the least. Thank you!!

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by bratschespeilerin — May 18, 2024 @ 11:20 am

    • Thank you for your reply and vote of confidence. You make good points about getting rid of repetitious programming. I too am not aware that WPR held any public meetings about the new changes. But I suspect they did use focus groups of some kind. Or perhaps new director Sarah Ashworth was simply given free rein to do whatever she wanted to and thought necessary, or too do what she had already done at other public radio stations in Minnesota, Vermont and New Hampshire. Please stay in touch and send the blog a comment about how you find navigating and listening to the two new networks to be. Best wishes, The Ear

      Like

      Comment by welltemperedear — May 18, 2024 @ 12:11 pm

      • Jake,

        Sarah Ashworth joined WPR after the planning for the change was well under way.

        According to a friend of mine, who used to be an engineer for Wisconsin Public Broadcasting, this change is a continuation of plans Jack Mitchell had put in place during his years here. Unfortunately, like other plans of his, it shouldn’t have happened.

        I am a decades long listener to WERN, as are almost all of my large group of friends both here in the Madison area, and a couple overseas, and not a one of them has expressed any enthusiasm for the changes, and none of them was ever contacted to be part of a focus group, nor did they hear about any public meetings about it.

        I’m guessing that any focus groups were targeted for their willingness to toe the WPR line in regard to the change.

        Liked by 1 person

        Comment by bratschespeilerin — May 20, 2024 @ 11:04 am

  6. I agree with you about their playing too much second-rate music. But at the same time, the playing of sometimes lesser/known music results in our discovering a new composer we actually like! I’m not happy about the change but I understand it was done in an effort to increase their listener base, which has been declining, apparently, as people switch over to various music-streaming sources.

    Ann

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by Ann Boyer — May 18, 2024 @ 6:36 am

    • Hi Ann. Thank you for your reply. You are right. Sometimes they stumble on something very worthwhile that has been overlooked — just as much of Bach’s, Vivaldi’s and Schubert’s music was — to say nothing of music by women and minorities.

      But I think the many of the hosts have heard too much of what the public wants to hear and too often don’t use the merit of the music as the main criterion but the identity of the composer.

      It is not all or nothing. Some of the “rediscoveries” are worthwhile and should stay in the repertoire without getting overplayed (Florence Price comes to mind). But many more deserve the judgment of neglect that history has imposed on them. Best wishes, Jake

      Like

      Comment by welltemperedear — May 18, 2024 @ 12:18 pm

  7. I am thrilled that we will get Stephanie earlier and for more hours. And that we will get more of Ruthanne’s request program on Saturdays.
    If you need to switch stations these days that means a one time preset and then pushing a button a few times a day.
    This change finally brings a public radio music station to the Milwaukee area.
    I think it is going to work.

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by Mary Gordon — May 18, 2024 @ 6:33 am

    • Hi Mary. Thank you for your reply. I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I prefer news to music very early in the morning. Too often the request program on Saturday is just a rehash of what I have heard earlier in the week but with a cloying touch of a support group atmosphere added to it. And I suspect there was another way of bringing classical music to Milwaukee than such a drastic redesign of WPR. Anyway, I hope you enjoy the new scheduling and changes as much as you think you will. Best wishes, Jake

      Like

      Comment by welltemperedear — May 18, 2024 @ 12:22 pm

  8. Yes, indeed, correct, smiles at, once again, articulating what I and others are thinking and feeling, Jake. Thank you. My listening routine and schedule mirrors yours and have programmed the changes on home BOSE and car radio. Sighs. Sometimes a classical music host digs into the library dregs and even plays a selection on one of my CDs and I am a sustaining supporter so will give it a chance and jump through the hoops to hear what I like. No other options but streaming the beloved WFMT from hometown Chicago. More sighs. Thanks as always, Jake. Fan of the EAR, Myrna Casebolt

    Liked by 1 person

    Comment by diacon2 — May 18, 2024 @ 3:31 am

    • Thank you Myrna for your support and kind words. Making the public jump through hoops to get to a public service never seems like a very good strategy to me. Easier is usually much more successful than harder. But perhaps we will be proven wrong. Happy listening as your reward for such new efforts! Best wishes, Jake

      Like

      Comment by welltemperedear — May 18, 2024 @ 12:25 pm


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,229 other subscribers

    Blog Stats

    • 2,497,807 hits